
Why Constructive Conflict Resolution
Matters to Staff and Administrators
As individuals who work on campus know, colleges and universities
are complex organizations. Theorists have struggled to adequately
describe their essential features, characterizing them as complex
bureaucracies; as collegial communities of scholars; as political
environments made up of competing interest groups; and as "organized
anarchies." Recognizing this complexity, administrators must use
all the tools at their disposal to function effectively within
them.
Mediation is Good for Administrators
From the point of view of an administrator, mediation and other
forms of constructive conflict resolution may be useful for a
broad variety of reasons. For one thing, internal, low-level resolution
of disputes is clearly preferred to more costly options such as
internal upheaval, bad publicity, or litigation. And litigation
is a real concern these days. The number and cost of lawsuits
involving colleges appears to have increased, as evidenced by
a rise average legal defense costs for private colleges and universities
nationwide some 250% in the five years between 1992-97.
Well-coordinated systems for resolving issues internally may
be desirable on both philosophical and practical grounds. On the
philosophical level, a stated goal of resolving conflicts in-house
may express the institution's belief in its duty to protect the
rights of its members from unfair institutional or individual
policies and practices. On a practical level, adding mediation
and other informal channels for conflict management may better
serve the desires of campus constituents (Rowe, 1990 and 1997).
The internal adjudication forums found in most grievance procedures,
when combined with mediation options, can provide a fair and flexible
the means of resolving conflicts within the institution, making
successful resolution more likely.
The legal environment for mediation and Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR) seems to be improving as well. Federal and state
law increasingly supports ADR, creating a better legal environment
for the growth of programs. For instance, the Federal Civil Rights
Act of 1991 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 endorse
ADR to resolve discrimination and equal access disputes. The Administrative
Dispute Resolution Act of 1990 strongly suggests enabling settlements
at the lowest level.
Similarly, in May of 1998, President Clinton issued an executive
order requiring all Federal agencies to take steps to promote
greater use of mediation, arbitration, early neutral, agency ombuds,
and other alternative dispute resolution techniques, and promote
greater use of negotiated rulemaking. Within the legal profession,
a recent American Bar Association poll (Reuben, 1996) of a representative
sample of lawyers revealed that 51% of those polled favored mediation
over litigation, while only 31% preferred litigation. Recently
ombuds practitioners have begun pioneering work on establishing
confidentiality shield laws for campus ombuds that if successful
will most certainly benefit mediation program efforts as well.
During times of decreasing enrollments or increased competition
for college-bound students, concern among campus decision-makers
about retention of students also often increases. Less than 15
percent of all student departures result from academic dismissal
(Tinto, 1987). Instead most students leave college voluntarily
due to a variety of concerns that include conflict or feelings
of isolation. Nationwide, only about 50% of all doctoral students
will complete their graduate programs. Conflicts with faculty
are cited as one of the two most important reasons that they leave
their graduate programs (Nerad and Miller, 1996). Mediation provides
an additional tool for preventing students from leaving due to
unresolved or painful conflict experiences by facilitating the
airing of concerns that need to be resolved. Folger and Shubert
(1985) found in their study of student grievance mechanisms on
20 colleges and universities that mediators addressed a much wider
range of student issues than did other dispute resolvers, helping
to get at disputes that might otherwise fuel attrition.
Mediation is Good for Staff
Mediation can serve those who staff a college's offices and support
programs in two ways. First, it can provide additional resources
for handling conflicts that are brought to them -- whether those
conflicts involve students, community members, or supervisees.
Second, it provides resources for resolving conflicts in which
they are themselves involved. Some of the particular benefits
of mediation for staff vary based on the particular role the staff
member plays on campus, as noted below.
Residence Hall staff, when supported by their supervisors to
do so, often appreciate the option to refer appropriate cases
to mediation. It can free up their time for working on educational
programs and other tasks and educate students about the availability
and value of non-hierarchical, self-directed conflict resolution.
Student counselors, or employee assistance program staff often
hear about interpersonal conflicts where they cannot intervene
due to their lack of access to the second party. While both parties
to the dispute may be needed to solve the problem, because of
the confidential nature of their work and the limits of their
mission, they may have no mechanism for creating a neutral forum.
The availability of mediation services can remedy this concern.
Campus police and security personnel often appreciate being
able to refer recurring conflicts to mediation, rather than waiting
for them to escalate to the point where it has become serious
enough to warrant an arrest. This is often true with respect to
noise complaints.
Staff members in conflict with other staff members may not feel
comfortable taking their disputes to someone in the same supervisory
chain, or may be reluctant to let these others know about all
the problems involved in the dispute. Reasons for reluctance include
uncertainty as the neutrality of the supervisor, concerns about
confidentiality and the impact revealing oneself may have on future
actions of the supervisor, power and authority imbalances, and
the perceived skills and temperament of the supervisor. Mediation
is often seen as a welcome confidential and informal means for
resolving disputes.
There are also staff conflicts that, without mediation as an
alternative, have no place to go on most campuses. A typical example
is a supervisor hearing second-hand that an employee is talking
negatively about the supervisor or the office. Loyalty is not
an explicit part of most job descriptions and personnel and grievance
structures are not organized to handle such problems until the
supervisor finds a way to get back at the employee--usually through
performance review reports--and the employee files a grievance.
Mediation is well suited to handle such conflict anomalies prior
to their escalation.
Mediation can be used in a variety of ways to handle a wide
range of individual and social problems and needs. Its actual
application varies tremendous from one campus to the next, based
in part on the organizational culture and the type of campus populations
involved.
Perhaps the best gift mediation has to offer educators is a
model for promoting individuals' capacities and responsibilities
for making decisions about their lives; for building a sense of
community; for fostering mutual respect and cooperation; and for
developing the use of fairness rather than power as a basis for
resolving disputes. These are skills everyone needs in addressing
the complexity of our individual and collective lives.
|