What Questions May be Addressed by this Measure?
This tool is designed to examine whether training successfully
contributed to the professional development of your mediators and/or
trainees. It will answer several questions. Is training meeting
participants’ expectations? Are they satisfied with the training
they are getting? What specific aspects of training do they find
helpful? Less helpful? What would they change to make training even
better?
How Do I Use This Measure?
Two versions of the same survey are provided, one for pre- and
one for post-training. They ask the same questions in the same order.
The survey is for the participants to complete although you may
want to develop a modified version for trainers to complete. Administer
the pre-test immediately before the training begins, in conjunction
with other assessments or paperwork. Administer the post-test survey
immediately at the end of training. You will want to think through
issues of confidentiality.
How to score - The instrument is positively skewed, which
means there is no need to reverse any scores – a high score
means high satisfaction and expectations, a low score indicates
low.
Satisfaction (items 1-6 on survey)
a. Determining satisfaction for an individual participant:
1. Add the value for items 1-6 together,
creating a sum score for the person. The highest score possible
is 30 and the lowest 6. Do this for both the pre- and post-test
surveys.
2. Compute the average score (i.e., divide
by 6) for both the pre- and post-test results.
3. Subtract the pre-test average score
from the post-test average score.
Positive difference è training was satisfactory
Negative difference è training was unsatisfactory
b. Determining overall satisfaction:
1. Compute the overall average score by
adding together all the individual average scores (those computed
in #2 above) and dividing by the number of participants. Do this
for both the pre- and post-test results.
2. Follow instructions for #3 above.
Expectations (items A1-A3):
A. Determining whether expectations were met for an individual
participant:
1. Add the value for items A1-A3 together,
creating a sum score. The highest score possible is 15 and the lowest
5.
2. Compute the average score. Do this for
both pre- and post-test surveys.
3. Subtract the pre-test average score
from the post-test average score.
Positive difference = training met expectations
Negative difference = training did not meet expectations
B. Determining whether expectations were met overall:
1. Compute the overall average score by
adding together all the individual average scores (those computed
in #2 above) and dividing by the number of participants. Do this
for both the pre- and post-test results.
2. Follow instructions for #3 above.
Changes/Modifications for Future Training (items B1-B3 on survey):
1. Review all participants’ answers
to identify emergent patterns in the responses.
2. Do this for each of the three (3) questions.
A note about Reliability and Validity: The instrument has
had no extensive validity and reliability work conducted on it.
Face validity was addressed through review of the instrument by
conflict resolution trainers but no inter-rater agreement was established.
One reliability analysis was conducted using an adapted version
of the instrument by Kmitta, 2000. Chronbach’s alpha on that
analysis was a respectful .83.
What Information Will the Results Give Me?
The results can help determine whether expectations for skill and
basic knowledge acquisition are being met. Use the information to
identify specific areas of improvement for training in the future.
Site__________________
Date__________________
Mediation Training – Pre-Workshop
Assessment (All responses are confidential)
Please indicate how much you agree with each of the following
statements:
|
1 = strongly disagree 2 = disagree 3 = moderate
4 = agree 5 = strongly agree
|
1. I feel that I often use what I learn in a training
workshop.
1 2 3 4 5
2. I recommend attendance of training workshops.
1 2 3 4 5
3. The amount of material covered in a training workshop
is usually appropriate.
1 2 3 4 5
4. Training workshops, regardless of focus, are usually
a productive use of my time.
1 2 3 4 5
5. I find the content of training to be more important
than the style of the presenter. 1 2 3 4 5
6. In general training workshops are interesting.
1 2 3 4 5
Please indicate your level of expectation for each of the following
statement:
|
1 = none 2 = a little 3 = neutral 4 = high
5 = very high
|
A1. I expect to learn basic knowledge about how to conduct a mediation.
1 2 3 4 5
A2. I expect to develop mediation skills.
1 2 3 4 5
A3. My overall expectations for this mediation workshop are:
1 2 3 4 5
Please answer the following short answer questions. Use the
back of this page if you need more space.
B1. What do you like about training workshops?
B2. What do you dislike about training workshops?
B3. What would you do to improve a training workshop?
Some background information:
Name__________________________
Affiliation (Organization/School)__________________
Profession/Major _____________________ Years of Education/Year
in School _____________
Gender
_____ Female
_____ Male
How many training workshops have you attended over the past 12
months?______________
Site__________________
Date__________________
Mediation Training – Post-Workshop
Assessment (All responses are confidential)
Please indicate how much you agree with each of the following
statement:
|
1 = strongly disagree 2 = disagree 3 = moderate
4 = agree 5 = strongly agree
|
1. I feel that I will use what I learned in the mediation
training workshop.
1 2 3 4 5
2. I would recommend attendance to this mediation training
workshop.
1 2 3 4 5
3. The amount of material covered in the training workshop
was appropriate.
1 2 3 4 5
4. The mediation training workshop was a productive
use of my time.
1 2 3 4 5
5. I found that content was more important than the
style of the mediation trainers. 1
2 3 4 5
6. In general the mediation training workshop was interesting.
1 2 3 4 5
Please indicate the level of fulfilment for each of the following
statement:
|
1 = none 2 = a little 3 = neutral 4 = high
5 = very high
|
A1. My expectation for knowledge about conducting a mediation was
met.
1 2 3 4 5
A2. My expectation for skill development in conducting a mediation
was met.
1 2 3 4 5
A3. Overall, my expectations for this workshop were fulfilled.
1 2 3 4 5
Please answer the following short answer questions. Use the
back of this page if you need more space.
B1. What did you like about the mediation workshop training?
B2. What did you dislike about the mediation workshop training?
B3. What would you do to improve the mediation workshop training?
Some background information:
Name__________________________
Affiliation (Organization/School)__________________
Profession/Major _____________________ Years of Education/Year
in School _____________
Gender
_____ Female
_____ Male
How many training workshops have you attended over the past 12
months?______________
<-Back to Eval Home -- Up To Contents
-- Continue to Next Unit->
|