Leadership
Development: Conflict Management for College Student
Leaders (page 2 of 3)
In
an analysis of the literature about college student organizations,
Street (1997) found that little research had been reported
on student organizations. He found that most of the literature
involving student organizations dealt with the role organizations
play in student involvement and student development. Most
of the research examined the efforts that elements in the
college environment, such as student organizations, had
on college students. The challenge is for student affairs
staff to assume their appropriate role as equal partners
in the educational training and development of student leaders
(McIntire, 1989). Many colleges and universities have set
leadership training as a high priority goal (Newton, 1975;
Faulkner, 1997). Sogunro (1997) cautions, however, that
when training does occur, program providers lack the assessment
of training impacts on program participants. Street (1997)
specifically proposes that student affairs professionals
perform research on student organizations and the effectiveness
of various interventions on student organization development.
He found that reported research on the use of organization
development in college student organizations described new
practices, programs, and techniques for working with student
organizations but did not reflect attempts to measure the
effectiveness of interventions.
Just as managing conflict is one of the aims of group leaders
(Kormanski, 1982), one of the major challenges facing student
affairs administration is student conflict. Conflict in
any organization, especially those as volatile as student
organizations (Franck, 1983), cannot be eliminated, but
students can be trained to better manage conflict, while
gaining invaluable life skills. Morton Deutsch (1994), renowned
author of literature in conflict principles, training, and
research, points out that mediation, conciliation, arbitration,
problem-solving workshops and other forms of intervention
are in widespread demand and use. Hugenberg & Moyer
(1996) suggested that leaders, and as a result groups, who
avail themselves to information on negotiation and mediation
techniques will be more prepared to effectively facilitate
outcomes of group conflict, enhance group satisfaction,
and build quality interpersonal relationships.
The Research Study
Our
study explored the influence of conflict managment skills
training on members of the Council of Student Organizational
Presidents. From the larger group of 159 members, 30 student
presidents were randomly assigned to the experimental group
and 30 student presidents to the control group. A pretest/posttest
experimental design was used in administering a self-reporting
conflict management style survey to both groups. A 10-hour
conflict management skills intervention was designed by
the researcher to enhance participants' organizational leadership
behaviors in the areas of understanding the nature of conflict,
conflict management styles, communication, and the conflict
management models of negotiation and mediation. This training
was provided to the experimental group but not the control
group.
Our
research hypotheses explored the difference in the self-reported
pretest conflict management survey scores of the experimental
group and control groups; comparative group gains on posttest
scores between the experimental group and control group;
differences in the self-reported conflict management pretest
and posttest survey scores of the experimental group; and
the perceived usefulness of the intervention by the experimental
group. Demographic characteristics of both groups were obtained.
The
Results
Comparison
of pretest and posttest scores revealed a significant increase
in the Integrating Style score and approaching a significant
decrease in the Obliging Style score for the experimental
group who received the treatment. An increase in the Integrating
Style is advocated as the only true and most effective approach
for all concerned parties in resolving interpersonal conflict,
so this can be taken as good news.
The
control group, who received no treatment, showed no change
from pre to posttest. There were no significant differences
in the group gains on posttest scores between the two groups.
Additional analysis revealed no relationship between gender
or student classification and conflict management style.
The post assessment survey revealed that a very high percentage
of the experimental respondents agree or strongly agree
that conflict management skills intervention increases a
leader's capability to promote a collaborative instead of
a competitive conflict management style, increases confidence
to use conflict constructively, and helps to establish group
process understanding within student organizations.
On
the basis of these findings, the researcher concluded that
conflict management style might be improved through conflict
management skills intervention. In an effort to aid in leadership
development, student retention, campus community building,
and reduction in campus violence and expulsion, further
investigation of the use of conflict management intervention
with various groups on the college campus is clearly warranted.
Page
last updated
11/27/2005
A
project of Campus Conflict Resolution
Resources.
Supported by a FIPSE grant from the US Department of Education
and seed money from the Hewlett Foundation-funded CRInfo
project.
Correspondence
to CMHE Report
(Attn: Bill Warters)
Campus Conflict Resolution Resources Project
Department of Communication
585 Manoogian Hall
Wayne State University
Detroit, MI 48201.
Please
send comments, bug reports, etc. to the Editor.
© 2000-2005 William C. Warters & WSU,
All rights reserved.